Today was show and tell, it was really good to see what everyone had been getting on with and to see how people had approached the idea of range differently. Some of the work made me really think about different approaches I could take and I was genuinely impressed with a lot of the work. Also seeing things other people had done made me realise that I had probably made similar mistakes that I could address.
Anyway, questions & answers from todays session;
Does the ‘Butterfly Effect’ brief have enough of a range?
- could propose other films
- yes, but if time expand into stationery
- iphone app if time
With the introduction in the key booklet now does that help the understanding of the work? (butterfly effect)
- yes, much better
- key and event book adds clarity
Originally each pictogram was going to be a different colour, does keeping them the two same colours work? (scuba diving)
- yes the colours work, simple & clear
- 2 colours work, perhaps change the colours to something brighter
- yes, but red is vibrant and blue is dull
- hard to know without context but would be good to see the colour options
Do the examples of pictograms work at the smaller scale? Are they clear in their meaning? (you can write on the print out)
- slightly smaller than they can go, makes lines on scuba diver thicker
- pictograms are all clear but the wall one is a little hard to get
- colours are nice but makes the smaller ones less clear
What sort of impression do you get of ‘Equine Engineering’ by looking through the website proposal?
- High end, make body type smaller
- bit dry, look at DS emotion for different spin
- colours are great, add more details
- traditional not very innovative
Any major type errors that are staring you in the face with the website?
- body copy too big
Other comments:
- have different layout on the tshirts, information could be too detailed to print on clothing
- prints have worked well
No comments:
Post a Comment